Multiple Gtalk Login

Follow the below steps to login to multiple Gtalk usenames:

1. Go to your desktop and right click on Google Talk shortcut icon.

2. You can see the target path as “C:\Program Files\Google\Google Talk\googletalk.exe”

3. Simply add /nomutex at the end of that path.

4. Final Gtalk path should be “c:\program files\google\google talk\googletalk.exe” /nomutex

5. Now you can click on this Gtalk shortcut on your desktop as many times as you want. Each time you click on it, it will open a new window and will allow you to login with different login names at the same time.

6. You are done.

If you don’t have a Gtalk shortcut on your desktop, but want to do this Gtalk trick, you can navigate Right click on your desktop >> New >> Shortcut. Type “c:\program files\google\google talk\googletalk.exe” /nomutex in the shortcut field, and it will automatically make an multi login Gtalk username for you.


Read more...

Did we land on the moon?

Yes, of course. There are however, some people (not many) who do believe it was a hoax, but then some people are prepared to believe just about anything! Maybe it's because they saw the TV program "Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?"

Let's now move on to explain why all the reasons people believe it was a hoax are wrong. You do not need to be a rocket scientist to see the obvious errors in their arguments. In most cases common sense is all you need. But first, let's get something out of the way.

Photographic 'evidence'
Let's just take a look at some photographs that demonstrate how these errors arise. I cannot include them all, otherwise this page would take a week to load, but these silly claims come up time after time.

A) NASA forgot to paint the stars in the sky.
It is very popular with the hoax believers, but I can't understand why though, it's so easy to prove for you. I think it tells us something very important about the way they think.

Look mum! No stars, NASA forgot to paint them in!

The real reason is that when contrasted with the brightness of the astronauts and the lunar surface, the stars are just too dim to register on the photographic emulsion of the camera film. If the camera shutter were held open long enough for the stars to register, everything else would be over-exposed into a white featureless glare. You cannot have both visible on the one photograph, so the camera was set for the correct exposure for Buzz Aldrin and the lunar surface, not the stars. When standing on the lunar surface the astronauts could not visually observe the stars in the dark sky, because of the surface glare, they could only see them when standing in shadow. By the same token, if we take a photograph outdoors at night from a brightly illuminated surface, our photograph also would not show any stars in the sky.

I have been 'informed' (now that's a joke) by hoax believers that NASA were unable to reproduce the stars in their correct positions as seen from the moon, (being much too complicated a task for stupid NASA to calculate) so rather than get it wrong and risk being found out decided to leave them out. Ho ho ho hohoho! This argument is soooo ignorant of the facts! The stars are much too far away for any difference to be visible over the tiny distance of 250,000 miles from the earth to the moon. Take a photograph of the stars from earth, then six months later take another photograph. In this time span the earth will have shifted the maximum distance from one side of its orbit around the sun to the other, around 186,000,000 miles. Only a couple of the very nearest stars will be seen to have shifted against the background stars (this apparent shift is due to parallax) and even then, the shift is very small and is only perceptible by comparing the two photos very carefully.

Anyway, no need to take my word for it is there, I could be part of the conspiracy according to your way of thinking. Just pop outside one night and try to photograph the stars with a brightly illuminated object in the foreground. Try it, its easy enough to prove without the need of a massive conspiracy theory, just you and a camera is all that is required.

Case closed.

B) The Great Flag Waving
I just love this one, very nearly as much as the 'no stars ' one. Below is one of the pictures in question.

Neil and Aldrin deploy a U.S. flag on the Moon in 1969

The flag is held out in the unfurled position by an extendable rod running through the top of the flag, so that it can be viewed unfurled, and you can see the unnatural rigidity this gives to the top of the flag in the picture. The rod creates the effect of a breeze blowing the flag into that position. Without the supporting rod the flag would just hang limply down and would not reveal the stars and stripes. Flags are designed to be blown into position by the wind on Earth, so the support was added to replicate this, as there is no atmosphere on the Moon. The rod is not extended the full width of the flag and it looks like a breeze is causing a ripple in the flag.
It has also been claimed that some video clips show the flag waving in the breeze when it was planted. Not so. The movement of the flag is only because when astronauts were planting the flagpole they rotated it back and forth to better penetrate the lunar soil. Without an atmosphere it takes a while for this movement to damp down. There is not one video clip showing the flag moving when the astronauts are not holding it, a fact never mentioned by the hoax believers.
Do you really think that an errant breeze blowing through the set causing the flag to wave in what was supposed to be a total vacuum would not have been noticed? Such an obvious fact could not escape the notice of an entire film crew, besides which they would surely have called upon the services of experts to oversee operations to guard against this very sort of 'error'. They would simply have done another take.
Case closed.

C) The same background appears in two different locations
This one I feel is especially stupid. Almost deserving of a special award for supreme ignorance and lack of even the most basic common sense. How anyone can take this claim seriously is beyond me, they must be the village idiot!

Photos taken by the Apollo 15 crew

The photos above are the two most commonly used in support of this truly pathetic argument. The poor confused hoax believers claim that as the Lunar Module is only visible in one photo, it must show two different locations where NASA used the same fake backdrop twice. Pardon me while I fall off my chair laughing!
I would have thought it obvious that it is only necessary to move a short distance to one side and then point the camera at the same hills to remove the LM from the picture while still keeping the distant background almost exactly the same. I say 'almost' the same, because even though the hills are far away, they do move just a little, as can be seen in the two photos. The hills we can see are in fact more than 3 miles distant from the Lunar Module 'Falcon'. The astronauts were only able to reach them to gather rock samples because they used the lunar rover to make the journey. By moving say 50 or 100 feet to one side, the distant hills 3 miles away will appear to alter hardly at all, but the LM will no longer be in the frame, and that is exactly what we think.
Case closed.

All the other 'fake' photographs are explained just as easily with a little knowledge, and an understanding of how conditions on the Moon are very different to those here. With no atmosphere to scatter the light, things look a little odd on the Moon, we have a very black sky and a very bright surface. We see strong shadows everywhere, and our sense of distance is also fooled because there is no atmosphere to produce the familiar atmospheric haze that creates a distance perspective on Earth. Furthermore, with the gravity being only a sixth of Earth's gravity, things move and behave differently as well. It's hard to make straight comparisons, because we cannot, the Moon is just not like the Earth. We have to think differently when interpreting the images from the Moon, and that's what causes the problems, people are not allowing for those differences when looking at the lunar photographs. They are looking at them as if they were taken under normal Earth conditions, and concluding wrongly that there must be something wrong with the photographs. There isn't!



Read more...

Why is it dangerous to look at the solar eclipse directly?

You actually can safely look at a total solar eclipse while the sun is _totally_ blocked by the moon. It looks like the moon has a fiery white aura, and it is one of the more spectacular things I have ever seen.


Solar Eclipse - Courtesy NASASo why do people say it's dangerous to look at a solar eclipse? Well, in general (during non-eclipse times), you've probably been told not to stare at the sun. This is because the sun simply outputs more power than our eye is designed to handle, and exposing our eye to that kind of power can damage the retina. And in a nutshell, solar eclipses are dangerous because the sun can come out from behind the moon and "surprise you" before you have a chance to look away. And this is actually even worse than when you normally look away from the sun because during the total eclipse, it is dark out, and your pupil therefore dialates so that it can let in enough light to get a good picture. Then, when the sun reappears and starts flooding the area with really bright light, not only are you staring straight at it, but your eye is in a state where it is wide open, and actively trying to let in as much light as possible.

This explains why it is easy to damage your eye when watching a total solar eclipse, and why you should either be sure to time it very carefully (and allow for a good margin of error), or just view the thing through one of those sets of cheap "dark" glasses they sell for the express purpose of looking at the sun without getting hurt.


Read more...

Pirated movie release types

A movie is usually released in several formats and different versions due to the fact that the primary sources used by a group for a particular movie may vary.
Examples of some those types are CAM, DVDRIP, PDVDRIP, TS, DVDSCR, R5, TS etc.

Here is a list of commonly used types.


Type: Cam
Label: CAM
Quality issues make this an unpopular format.A copy made in a cinema using a camcorder, possibly mounted on a tripod. The sound source is the camera microphone. Cam rips can quickly appear online after the first preview or premiere of the film.

Type: Telesync
Label: "TS", "TELESYNC", "PDVD"
Contrary to popular belief, the video quality of a TS is not necessarily better than a cam. The term Telesync doesn't indicate better video quality but better audio quality. The CAM source is then synchronized with a secondary audio recording, either done with a professional microphone in an empty cinema, fed directly from the cinema's sound system, or captured from an FM radio transmission intended for hearing-impaired customers. Often, a "Cam" is mislabeled as a telesync. PDVD, also known as Pre-DVD, is a release type found mostly in India and/or for Indian movies, with Bollywood movies being the majority. They are often mistaken for being DVD rips, due to the name.

Type: Workpoint
Label: "WP", "WORKPRINT"
A copy made from an unfinished version of a film produced by the studio. Typically a workprint has missing effects and overlays, and often differ from its theatrical release.

Type: Screener
Label: "SCR", "SCREENER", "DVDSCR", "DVD-SCREENER", "VHS-SCREENER"
These are early DVD or VHS releases of the theatrical version of a film, typically sent to movie reviewers, Academy members, and executives for review purposes.

Type: R5
Lebel: "R5"
The R5 Line is a retail DVD from region 5. Region 5 consists of Eastern Europe (Former Soviet Union), Indian subcontinent, Africa, North Korea, and Mongolia.

Type: Telecine
Label: "TC", "TELECINE"
A copy captured from a film print using a machine that transfers the movie from its analog reel to digital format. These were rare because telecine machines for making these prints were very costly and very large, however, recently they have become much more common. Telecine has basically the same quality as DVD, since the technique is same as digitizing the actual film to DVD.

Type: BD/BR Rip
Label: BDRip or BRRip
Similar to DVD Rip, only the source is a Bluray disc

Type: DVD Rip
Label: "DVDRip"
A final retail version of a film, typically released before it is available outside its originating region. Often after one "release group" releases a high-quality DVD-Rip, the "race" to release that film will stop. Because of their high quality, DVD-Rips generally replace any earlier copies that may already have been circulating.


Type: DVDR
Label: "DVDR"
A final retail version of a film in DVD format. Usually a complete copy from the original DVD and having same size.


Read more...

Dell XPS M1530: Laptop Review

Dell XPS M1530

XPS M1530 is equipped with the following specs:

* 15.4-inch WXGA (1280 x 800) CCFL glossy screen
* "Crimson" red paint (also available in "Tuxedo" black or "Alpine" white)
* 2.2GHz Core 2 Duo T7500 processor, Santa Rosa chipset (up to 2.4GHz available)
* 2GB DDR2-667 SDRAM (up to 4GB DDR2 SDRAM available)
* 160GB 5400 RPM SATA HDD (32GB SSD drive available)
* Slot-loading dual-layer DVD±RW drive
* NVIDIA GeForce Go 8600M GT with 256MB GDDR3
* WWAN option for Verizon
* Ethernet, 802.11a/g/n (Intel 4965), Bluetooth option
* Integrated 2.0 megapixel webcam
* HDMI, VGA, S-Video, Firewire/1394, three USB 2.0 ports
* Integrated media reader (MS, SD, xD), fingerprint reader
* Media Center remote located in ExpressCard slot
* Windows Vista Home Premium
* Dimensions (with 6-cell battery): 14.06" x 10.34" x 0.93" - 1.38"
* Weight starts at 5.9 pounds with 6-cell battery (6.29 pounds with 9-cell)

Dell also includes a Media Center remote control that fits neatly into the ExpressCard slot on the side of the notebook. This is a great accessory for presentations or if you want to control a DVD from across the room.

Cost is arouond Rs 50,000
For more Dell XPS 1530
http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4135

http://www.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx/xpsnb_m1530?c=us&cs=19&l=en&s=dhs

Read more...

Quotes from Kung Fu Panda

I had watch Kung Fu Panda for 3 times already. But it still makes me laugh. Really Awesome. So I decided to list down some quotations or simply 'sayings' from the movie. It is one movie that have to be remembered.

1. 'There is no charge for awesomeness or attractiveness' - Po

2. 'One often meets his destiny on the road he takes to avoid it' - Master Oogway

3. 'Your mind is like this water my friend. When it is agitated, it becomes difficult to see. But if you allow it to settle, the answer becomes clear' - Master Oogway

4. 'There are no accidents' - Master Oogway

5. 'I probably suck more than anyone in the history of Kung Fu, in the history of China, and in the history of sucking' - Po

6. 'Yesterday is history. Tomorrow is a mystery. But today is a gift. That is why it is called 'Present' - Master Oogway

7. 'To tie a victory is to find your opponent weaknesses and make him suffer for it. To take his strength and use it against him until he finally falls or quits' - Master Shifu

8. 'Look at this tree. I cannot make it blossom when it suits me nor making it fruit before its time' - Master Oogway

9. 'To make something special, you just have to believe in special' - Po's Father

Last but not least: 'I'm not dying you idiot. I'm simply at peace' You can guess who said that. Right?
Remember it and maybe you can use it in IM or classes. Even when you beat somebody in video games.

Read more...

Undo Sent Mail In Gmail

The official Gmail blog introduced a new Gmail labs feature to undo the sent mail. If you have sent an email without attaching any file or mis spelled or forgot to write content this feature will help you to undo the sent mail.

So that you can stop sending mail to receiver .

et’s see the steps to enable this feature

1. Log in to your Gmail account

2. Move to settings page and select labs option (If you haven’t enabled Gmail labs click here)

3. Find out undo send option in labs and enable it

4. Save the settings and come back to Gmail.


Read more...

Add "Read More..." Expandable Posts link in Blogger

This tutorial is very easy if you just follow this step by step tutorial properly. With this hack, you can choose to display only a selected amount of text from the beginning of each post as a teaser instead of showing the entire post on the front page of your blog. Then when people want to read the rest of your post, they can click a “Read more...” link to read your entire post.

1. Login to your Blogger account and go to Layout > Edit HTML (click Expand Widget Template).

2. Find this line of code:

<data:post.body/>

3. Copy this code just before the code above:

<b:if cond='data:blog.pageType == "item"'>
<style>.fullpost{display:inline;}</style>
<p><data:post.body/></p>
<b:else/>
<style>.fullpost{display:none;}</style>

4. Now, copy this code just after the code above (<data:post.body/>):

<b:if cond='data:blog.pageType != "item"'><br />
<a expr:href='data:post.url'>Read more...</a>
</b:if>
</b:if>

5. Save your template.

1. In your Blogger Dashboard, go to Settings > Formatting and scroll all the way down to the bottom. Copy this code and then save settings:

<span class="fullpost">

</span>

Creating a New Post:

When you click the Posting tab (HTML mode), you'll notice that your default post template now has <span class="fullpost"> and </span> tags. Anything you put above the tag <span class="fullpost"> will be the teaser text. The main body of your post needs to go in between the <span class="fullpost"> and </span> tags.

Read more...

Search anything in 3D Cube

Search anything in a 3D Cube with Search-Cube search engine. This search engine uses Google API as a main source for searching.

Features

* You can search by rotating the cube
* Displays images and web search results inside Cube
* Easy to search with Search-Cube

Note : Holding Shift key and move mouse to rotate the cube or use arrow keys to rotate cube.

Visit : www.search-cube.com


Read more...

CTRL + ALT + DEL Not Working ?

Windows users often use CTRL + ALT + DEL keys to open task manager and end the current session for a particular application to prevent deadlocks.

Some times your system may be affected with virus or any other worms which does not allows to open task manager whenever you have pressed CTRL + ALT + DEL keys.

But there is an alternative way to open task manager just press CTRL + SHIFT + ESC keys.

Which opens your windows task manager, this is tested in Windows XP operating system.

Read more...

Type pwn to download YouTube videos

Getting confused of the topic? type pwn before youtube.com and replace the url with pwnyoutube.com thats all the video is available for download.

Steps to download from YouTube.com

1. View a video on YouTube.
2. In the URL location box, type pwn in front of youtube, and enter.
3. Get links to download the video


Read more...